Council scorecard
Folkestone & Hythe District Council
- Type
- district
- Population
- 110,000 (ONS mid-year estimate, rounded)
- Political control
- No overall control — Green + Liberal Democrat minority (since May 2023)
- Next election
- 6 May 2027 (whole council, all 30 seats)
- Council website
- www.folkestone-hythe.gov.uk
Scorecard
Methodology published 2026-05-18. Pending cells reflect data collection in progress, not methodology uncertainty — they will populate as the underlying data is gathered.
Refuse collection
Missed bin reports, recycling rates, complaint resolution time
Scored on the two DEFRA-published components — recycling rate and residual household waste, FY 2024-25 final data (England averages: 42.0% / 513.3kg per household) — with the remaining components (missed-bin reports, complaint resolution time, service consistency) pending data ingest. Folkestone & Hythe recycled 45.9% of household waste in 2024-25 — fourth-best in Kent and above the England average of 42.0% — with residual waste of 404.0kg per household vs 513.3kg nationally. Attribution: Green–Liberal Democrat minority administration (Jim Martin), in office since May 2023.
as of 2026-07-02 · source
Complaints handling
Volume, response times, LGSCO upheld findings
Small-numbers caveat: district-tier LGSCO investigation counts are tiny (0–4 a year) and a single case can swing the uphold percentage from 0% to 100%, so this score rests on process indicators — upheld volume per 100,000 residents vs the 1.0 district average, remedies offered before the Ombudsman, and compliance with recommendations — across 2025-26 and 2024-25, never on the raw uphold percentage alone. 2025-26 figures precede the LGSCO annual letters (due ~July 2026) and may be revised. 2025-26: 1 upheld of 3 investigations completed — 0.9 upheld per 100,000 residents, below the 1.0 district average — with timely compliance on the single case due; 2024-25: 1 upheld of 2, with the remedy already provided before the Ombudsman reached a finding. Attribution: Green–Liberal Democrat minority administration (Jim Martin) throughout both years.
as of 2026-07-02 · source
FOI response
Average response time, refusal/exemption rate, compliance with 20-day statutory deadline
One of only two Kent councils currently scoreable on FOI. F&H reports an FOI/EIR timeliness KPI in its performance reports: 87% of requests within 20 working days in 2024/25 (95% in Q4) — but it has missed its own 90% target every year since 2017/18 (low: 79.2% in 2018/19; 82.1% in 2023/24, which the council attributed to a significant increase in requests). ICO component: 5 decision notices in the three years to July 2026, including an upheld failure-to-respond-in-time finding (Aug 2025) and multiple upheld EIR failures (Aug 2024) — 9 upheld vs 4 not-upheld findings. The refusal-rate component (30%) is not published. Attribution: the 2023/24–2024/25 KPI years fall under the Green–Liberal Democrat minority administration (Jim Martin, from May 2023); earlier target misses under the preceding Conservative-led administration.
as of 2026-07-03 · source
Financial health & budget discipline
Revenue budget variance, capital programme delivery, reserves + Section 114 risk, external auditor VfM judgment, council tax positioning + trajectory vs national
Weighted across the six published components: revenue budget variance 25%, capital programme delivery 20%, reserves & Section 114 risk 20%, external auditor VfM judgement 15%, council tax positioning 10%, council tax trajectory 10%. 2024/25 outturn (the 2025/26 outturn was not yet published at collection): £193k net favourable on revenue; capital slippage improved to 20% (£13.6m delivered of £17.1m); General Fund reserve £4.7m plus £13.4m earmarked; auditor: no significant weaknesses (all criteria Amber) and an unqualified opinion, while flagging a £3.6m medium-term funding gap to close ahead of local government reorganisation. Council tax is the standing weakness: Band D £313.92 is the highest of the 12 Kent districts — a position held for 23 consecutive years — with a 5-yr CAGR of 2.78% vs 2.64% for districts nationally. Attribution: Green–Liberal Democrat minority administration (Jim Martin), in office since May 2023.
as of 2026-07-03 · source
Transparency
Open data publication, councillor expenses, contract register, committee paper publication
Fixed-date website audit (2026-07-03) against the Transparency Code checklist: spending-data currency and format, contracts register, councillor allowances, interests, committee papers, senior pay, open data, FOI disclosure log. Items not individually verified this quarter are scored neutrally and flagged. Monthly £250+ spending data current to May 2026 (a previously-reported procurement-card publication lapse appears remedied), a contracts register, senior salaries, organisation chart and pay multiples on a well-organised transparency hub. Councillor allowances and an FOI disclosure log were not verified on the hub this quarter. Attribution: audit conducted under the Green–Liberal Democrat minority administration (Jim Martin).
as of 2026-07-03 · source
Planning
Application approval ratios, appeal-overturn rate, determination time vs statutory targets
Scored against the England averages (majors in time 91.0%, non-majors 90.8%, major appeal overturns 3.1%) over the 24 months to March 2026 (speed) and June 2025 (appeal quality), from MHCLG designation-regime tables; the enforcement-trend component (15%) is pending and the three measured components are re-weighted pro rata. The national "in time" measure includes agreed extensions of time. The best non-major speed in Kent — 98.1% decided in time vs 90.8% for England — with 89.5% of majors in time (just below the England average) and a low 2.2% major appeal-overturn rate. Attribution: Green–Liberal Democrat minority administration (Jim Martin) throughout the April 2024 – March 2026 window.
as of 2026-07-02 · source
Education & children's services
SEND/EHCP statutory processing, SEND tribunal LA-loss rate, children's services Ofsted rating, school transport delivery (county + unitary only)
Education and children's services are not a district/borough function. The county council (or, for Medway, the unitary authority) holds this remit.
Safeguarding & LADO
LADO referral handling, multi-agency safeguarding (MASH) timeliness, Section 47 enquiry compliance, independent safeguarding audit findings (county + unitary only)
Safeguarding is the statutory function of the county council or unitary authority via the LADO (Local Authority Designated Officer) and multi-agency safeguarding hub.
Manifesto delivery (Trust)
KLN tracks what the controlling party promised at the most recent election vs what was actually delivered. KEPT/PARTIAL/BROKEN/PENDING/OUT_OF_SCOPE categorisation.
Trust score: 3 categorised public issues (no scoreable pledges yet).
as of 2026-09-29
Top public issues for Folkestone & Hythe residents
This is editorial assessment, not a metric score. Each issue carries an alignment tag — ALIGNED (council in step with residents), MIXED (some action falls short), COUNTERACTING (council against residents on this), or SILENT (no clear position). KLN-curated. Council positions added verbatim where provided. Right-of-reply opens with initial publication.
- 🟢Aligned
Princes Parade development — cancel vs proceed
The Princes Parade leisure-and-housing scheme has been a contentious resident issue for years. Local opposition is high; previous administration backed delivery.
Council position
The Green and Liberal Democrat administration elected in May 2023 committed to cancel the Princes Parade development. It did: the scheme was formally abandoned, the council describes it as undeliverable, and the 18-acre council-owned site is to be left as it is. The cost of the failed scheme to the council has been reported at around £4.4 million.
KLN assessment
Aligned — moved from MIXED at the 10 September 2026 review, when the cancellation was confirmed as operationalised rather than merely promised. The action residents asked for was taken. The remaining question is financial, not planning: the write-off falls on the council's reserves and is tracked under Metric 4.
Evidence
- 🟡Mixed
Homelessness + cost of living
F&H has visible street homelessness + winter sleeping pressure. Residents expect year-round response.
Council position
Greens 2023 manifesto committed to year-round homelessness action plan + community-group partnerships.
KLN assessment
Commitment in intent; action plan publication + measurable street-count reductions are the action evidence. Per the "actions, not statements" principle: MIXED.
- 🟡Mixed
Coastal erosion + flooding defence
F&H coastline + low-lying marshes face erosion + flood risk; Environment Agency sea defences are partial.
Council position
F&H DC role is partner + statutory consultee on EA-led schemes; lobbying for funding the gap.
KLN assessment
Mixed: council operates within constrained authority. Lobbying for EA funding is the channel.
News from this council's area
How this scorecard works
Each metric is scored 0-100 and banded A through F. We do NOT aggregate to a single overall ranking — combining unrelated performance areas would mislead. See the methodology page for full details, thresholds, and data sources.
Spot an error or have data we should add for Folkestone & Hythe? editor@kentlocalnews.co.uk.